🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents applauding your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment recently after viral posts suggested that switching their profile gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" terminology - adding action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which content appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your content shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she recycled previous content with comparable "agentic" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, stating "Each day I continued, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" described a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to unofficial tests where identical posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on various elements, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."