🔗 Share this article

A collective of victims of the state-led response amid the 2022 "Zan, Zendegi, Azadi" uprising has launched a landmark legal case naming 4 dozen identified Iranian officials of alleged crimes against humanity.

Legal Action Pursued in Argentina

The application for a judicial probe to be commenced was filed within the Argentine judicial framework. This step was taken by a coalition aided by a human rights advocacy organization. Argentina's legal framework are particularly open to accommodating universal jurisdiction claims.

The document alleges that the reaction from Iranian authorities to the protests included "discharging live ammunition, non-lethal projectiles, metal pellets designed for short distances, and other projectiles at protesters." The case further details arbitrary roundups, custodial torture, and death sentences of participants that allegedly continue to this day.

Confidential Names

Named individuals from within the range of Iran's intelligence apparatus have been identified in the legal documents, but their identities are currently being withheld from the public.

Individual Accounts Fuel the Legal Action

One of the complainants, residing in the United Kingdom Mahsa Piraei, commented that the objective "is far from retribution in a individual way, but accountability and fact-finding." Her mother, Minoo Majidi, aged 62, was shot dead in the autumn of 2022. Medical examinations showed more than 167 steel projectiles had been fired into her posterior at extremely close proximity. She had been participating in a street protest concerning the death of Mahsa Amini, a youthful Kurdish woman who was killed while detained.

Piraei, one of Majidi's three children, was based abroad at the period of her mother's violent demise. She returned to Iran at considerable peril to pay respects at the burial site. Her sibling Roya shared a picture of herself by their parent's burial site with her scalp shaved on a restricted social media account. A friend shared the photograph, which went viral, eventually forcing Roya to seek exile for Turkey.

Piraei added: "Via official complaints and record-keeping the goal is to safeguard proof, identify offenses and prevent erasure." She described her mother's death as "systematic in nature but part of a common procedure."

Other Litigants Consist of Victims of Blinding

The other two litigants who have come forward are Kowsar Eftekhari and Mersedeh Shahinkar, both individuals who suffered eye injuries at short distance by marker guns.

Eftekhari, a university-aged student, was hit in the right eye in late 2022. She had been demonstrating for weeks, witnessing fellow protesters being shot with lethal fire and being struck herself with electronic batons. During a demonstration on a day in October, she was at a demonstration near a educational institution when a plainclothes officer struck her with numerous rounds from a distance of about a meter. He then is said to have targeted her eye when she did not respond to his command to scatter. A video of the attack showing blood pouring from her face went viral, and she was later given refuge in Germany.

Shahinkar, aged 38 when injured on October 18th, only became aware what had transpired when she sensed something wet on her cheek. Fellow demonstrators advised her not to board an emergency vehicle for fear of being transported to a detention center. When she eventually reached a treatment facility, a worker told her to go away because they did not help demonstrators. A doctor examined her and referred her to a medical center, where Shahinkar pretended a stone had unintentionally damaged her vision so she would not be denied treatment. She posted details of her wounds online, and in the new year, individuals came for her, leading her to leave the country. She later collected a notable recognition as a figure of the movement.

Global Legal Concept Offers Foundation for Action

The group pursuing the criminal investigation assert that the complaint is not viewed just as a symbolic gesture with no hope of a tangible resolution. Universal jurisdiction allows allegations to be probed in a third country even if the crime did not occur in that country and the accused is not located there. Argentina has notably open regulations on such cases in the world.

The doctrine of universal jurisdiction has historically facilitated dozens of convictions and the launch of prosecutions covering violations perpetrated in many nations. Legal actions are presently being pursued in several different countries.

As the request is exclusively for a judicial probe, and this is not a civil lawsuit, there is no demand by the litigants for money damages. This case would not constitute the first instance against Iranian authorities brought in Argentina.