🔗 Share this article

UN's top security body has adopted a US-backed measure that favors Morocco's position regarding the disputed Western Sahara, notwithstanding fierce resistance from neighboring Algeria.

Divided Decision Bolsters Morocco's Stance

While the recent decision was split, the measure constitutes the most significant endorsement to date for Moroccan plan to maintain control over the territory, which also has backing from most EU countries and a growing number of African allies.

Resolution Framework and Key Components

The resolution refers to Moroccan proposal as a basis for talks. As with earlier resolutions, the document doesn't include a vote on self-determination that contains independence as an option, which constitutes the approach traditionally supported by the independence-seeking Polisario movement and its allies.

Genuine self-rule under Morocco's authority could represent a most feasible resolution.

Background Context

Western Sahara is a phosphate-rich stretch of coastal arid land the area of Colorado which was under Spain's control until the mid-1970s. It is asserted by both Morocco and the Polisario movement, which functions from refugee camps in southwestern neighboring Algeria and asserts to represent the indigenous people native to the contested region.

Decision Patterns and International Reactions

The US, which proposed the resolution, led eleven nations in voting in support, while three nations – multiple nations – declined to vote. The neighboring country, Polisario's primary supporter, did not vote.

The US ambassador, the US representative to the United Nations, said the vote had been "historic" and would "build on the progress for a long, long overdue peace in Western Sahara".

The Algerian ambassador, the Algerian representative to the United Nations, said that while the measure was an advancement on previous iterations, it "contains a series of deficiencies".

Security Operation and Upcoming Review

The resolution also renews the UN security mission in Western Sahara for an additional twelve months, as has been done for over thirty years. Prior extensions, though, have not contained a reference to Moroccan and its allies' favored outcome.

The measure urges all parties participating to "seize this unprecedented chance for a enduring peace." Based on progress, it asks the UN leader to review the peacekeeping mission's mandate within half a year.

Regional Consequences and Current Conditions

The change could unsettle a long-stalled situation that for many years has eluded resolution, notwithstanding a United Nations peacekeeping operation that was designed to be temporary. Protests have followed in Sahrawi settlements in Algeria this week, where people have pledged not to abandon their struggle for self-determination.

The Moroccan government controls almost all of the territory, excluding a thin strip known as the "free zone" that lies to the east of a constructed by Morocco barrier.

Historical Background and Current Events

A 1991-era ceasefire was meant to facilitate a vote on self-determination, but disagreements over participation criteria blocked it from taking place.

Through time, the Moroccan government has transformed the disputed territory, building a deepwater port and a long highway. Government subsidies keep basic commodity costs affordable, and the population has ballooned as Moroccans settle in cities such as Dakhla and Laayoune.

Polisario withdrew from the ceasefire in recent years after clashes near a route the government was paving to Mauritania.

The group has subsequently frequently documented security operations, while Morocco has mostly denied active fighting. The United Nations calls it "limited tensions".

Global Diplomacy and Coming Possibilities

Reacting to the proposed measure, Polisario said that it would not join any initiative aiming "to 'legitimise' Moroccan unauthorized presence," adding resolution "cannot happen by supporting territorial claims".

The conflict constitutes the central issue in north African international relations. The Moroccan government views support for its proposal as a standard for how it gauges its allies.

Recently, the UN representative proposed dividing the territory, a suggestion no party agreed to. He encouraged the government to clarify what autonomy would entail and cautioned that a lack of development might raise questions about the UN's role and "if there remains opportunity and readiness for us to still be effective."

The push to reassess the United Nations Mission comes as the US slashes financial support for UN programmes and agencies, covering peacekeeping.